What Not to Do When Applying for Social Security Disability

What Not to Do When Applying for Social Security Disability What Not to Do When Applying for Social Security Disability Are you thinking of applying for Social Security Disability (SSD)? Before you do, check out our list of 5 important things to avoid on the road to receiving benefits.1) Don’t Send Incomplete or Inaccurate Forms To apply for Social Security Disability, you will need to complete a number of forms, and ensure that the information provided is correct. You will need to include an extensive amount of information, such as the names, addresses and phone numbers of all medical providers, complete medical records and more.If you do not fill out a form completely, either by leaving sections blank or accidentally providing wrong information, your case will likely be denied and you will need to start the process all over again.  Remember, intentionally providing false information, such as listing conditions you do not have, inaccurately listing dependents or including a false work history is incredibly detrimental to your case and is wrong. Make sure you are honest with your information. To avoid errors, contact an experienced SSD attorney. He or she can guide you through the process, fill out the paperwork for you and ensure everything is correct. Having an experienced SSD lawyer work with you can also help improve the chances your initial application will be approved.2) Don’t Stop Seeking Medical Treatment If you are in the process of applying for disability benefits or waiting for a decision, do not stop going to your doctor for medical appointments and treatments. Documents of your medical records, treatments, medications, dosages, etc. are extremely important evidence to prove your disability and help you get approved for benefits. Your medical records and continued treatment are critical for your claim. You should continue seeing your doctor and follow his or her instructions for your treatment at all times during the process.If you stop seeing a doctor, the Social Security Administration may determine that your condition is not severe enough to receive benefits.3) Don’t Only Report Some of Your Conditions Make sure to report all of the conditions you have that are affecting your way of life and ability to work. Don’t think that you are limited to only physical conditions. Your mental conditions could be negatively affecting your daily life, and you may have comorbid medical and mental disorders, meaning these conditions are occurring at the same time and may be caused by the primary condition.The Social Security Administration will review all of the conditions you listed in the application. Remember, it is important to have medical documentation of all disabilities, including mental conditions, to prove your disabilities. A skilled SSD attorney can help you with the entire application, including filling out all of your conditions and providing medical evidence.4) Don’t Miss Deadlines for Appeals If your application is denied, it is advised to appeal the denial. However, you must follow the appeals deadlines a nd send requests for a hearing within 60 days of receiving a denial.A skilled SSD lawyer is critical to have throughout the entire process, and especially during the appeals process. An experienced SSD lawyer can prepare all of the necessary evidence for your claim, help prepare you for what to expect at the hearing and provide strong legal representation to help you get approved for benefits.5) Don’t Do Drugs or Break the Law If drinking or drugs is proven to be the main reason for your disabilities or makes your conditions worse, it is likely your claim will be denied. A skilled SSD lawyer can help answer any questions you have about substance abuse. You should also avoid any kind of criminal activity as breaking the law can hurt your chances of receiving benefits.We Can HelpIf you are disabled and unable to work, call  Disability Attorneys of Michigan  for a free confidential consultation. We’ll let you know if we can help you get a monthly check and help you de termine if any money or assets you receive could impact your eligibility for disability benefits.Disability Attorneys of Michigan  works hard every day helping the disabled of Michigan seek the  Social Security Disability benefits  they need. If you are unable to work due to a physical, mental, or cognitive impairment, call  Disability Attorneys of Michigan  now for a free consultation at  800-949-2900.Let Michigan’s experienced Social Security Disability law firm help you get the benefits you deserve.Disability Attorneys of Michigan, Compassionate Excellence. Michigan Social Security Disability Attorney, Michigan Social Security Disability Lawyer

Definition and Examples of Expeditio in Rhetoric

Definition and Examples of Expeditio in Rhetoric Definition In an argument, the rhetorical term expeditio refers to the rejection of all but one of various alternatives. Also known as elimination,  the argument from residuals, the method of residues, and (in George Puttenhams phrase) the speedy dispatcher. An orator or persuader or pleader should go roundly to work, says George Puttenham, and by a quick and swift argument  dispatch his persuasion, and, as they are wont to say, not to stand all day trifling to no purpose, but to rid it out of the way quickly (The Arte of English Poesie,  1589). See Examples and Observations below. Also see: ArgumentationEnumeratioListingLogos Examples and Observations Elimination (or expeditio) occurs when we have enumerated the several ways in which something could have been brought about, and all are then discarded except the one on which we are insisting. (Caplan: Cicero, Quintilian, and Aristotle all regard this as a form of argument, not a figure. It is known in modern argumentation as the Method of Residues.)(James J. Murphy, Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory From Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. University  of California Press, 1974)Expeditio is when the speaker enumerates the reasons which may serve to prove something either possible or impossible, and after setting aside all the others, selects that reason which is valid and conclusive. It is frequently used in partitions.(George Winfred Hervey, A System of Christian Rhetoric. Harper, 1873) Richard Nixons Expeditio[M]uch more powerful in argument is expeditio, the device of setting out numbered options and then eliminating all but the one preferred . . .. [R ichard] Nixon uses this elimination logic in his speech justifying military combat in Cambodia, 1970: Now confronted with this situation [supplies coming from Cambodia], we have three options. First we can do nothing. . . . Our second choice is to provide massive military assistance to Cambodia itself. . . . Our third choice is to go to the heart of the trouble (Windt 1983, 138). Almost always, the final option is the preferred option.(Jeanne Fahnestock, Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford University Press, 2011) Anselm of Canterburys Expeditio: The Origin of Created ThingsMedieval scholastic theologians also attempted to prove creation ex nihilo by means of reason without any appeal to Scripture. An example of this was Anselms rational argument in his Monologion. He raised the question of the origin of created things. Logically, Anselm offered three possible answers: If . . . the totality of things visible and invisible is out of some material, it can only be . . . out of either the supreme nature, or out of itself, or out of some third essence. He quickly dismissed the third option because there just is no third essence. By process of elimination, this left two possibilities. He further dismissed the possibility that matter is from itself, reasoning: Again, everything that is out of matter is out of something other than itself and is posterior to [after] it. But because nothing is other than itself, or posterior to itself, it follows, therefore, that nothing is out of itself as material. B y process of elimination, this left only one option: The totality of things must exist out of the supreme nature.(Gregg R. Allison, Historical Theology: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine. Zondervan, 2011) Jimmie Dales ExpeditioTight-lipped, Jimmie Dale stared out at the black, flying walls as the subway train roared its way back to lower New York. He had been properly done! There could be no question about that. But by whom? And why? What did it mean? Intuition, even back there in The White Rat, had warned him that something was wrong, but he would in no way have been justified in being swayed wholly by intuition. He could not in justice blame himself for that. What was it? What was the meaning of it? Something had happened somewherebut not at The White Rat. And he had been very neatly side-tracked. All that was obvious.Was it Mother Margot? He shook his head. She had never yet double-crossed him, and he did not believe that she would dare to do so. Even her visit to the Sanctuary tonight, and her very evident wholesome respect for the Gray Seal, not to say fear, was almost proof in itself, it would seem, that she had not deliberately tried to mislead him.What, then? There seemed to be only one logical explanation left. The Phantom. It would not have been altogether a new move on the Phantoms part, for, while not wholly analogous, the man had in a way tried the same game before. The Phantom knew only too well, and to his cost, that there had been a leak somewhere in his entourage, a leak that had brought the Gray Seal very inopportunely on his heels more than once.(Frank L. Packard, Jimmie Dale and the Phantom Clue, 1922)